Is there a chemical in our brains that makes us trust others? And what determines when this does – or doesn’t – happen? Decades of research into the neuroscience of trust have answered some of these essential questions – and understanding it all can help you become a trusted expert on trust.
Considering the results of two recent global surveys on how organizational trust impacts employees and the organization, the neuroscience of trust is something every leader should understand.
The Neuroscience of Trust
The neurobiology of the brain’s trust chemical, oxytocin – and fascinating research on the effects of trust at work
The Neuroscience of Trust: Oxytocin
Let’s start with the most basic. The brain chemical oxytocin is our brain’s way of signaling trust. Neuroeconomist Paul Zak at Claremont Graduate University has led some fascinating experiments to prove that oxytocin is the brain’s trust chemical. In his experiments, the amount of oxytocin produced predicted both how much the participants trusted others and how trustworthy they were.
To prove that it wasn’t due to some other chemical or hormone, Zak and his team did another round of experiments in which they injected participants with synthetic oxytocin – and, sure enough, oxytocin was the cause: It significantly reduced the fear of trusting strangers.
While it’s good to keep in mind that things are rarely simple when it comes to brain chemistry, oxytocin is strongly correlated with our ability to trust and be trusted. And that led researchers, and us, to another question: What supports – or inhibits – the release of oxytocin? Here’s a breakdown:
We all have a sense that yeah, trust is probably kind of important to have at home and at work. But according to two recent global surveys of workplace culture, it turns out trust is nothing short of a game changer, for the organization and its employees. The following data on employees at high trust companies is from the research of Paul Zak, as outlined in his new book, Trust Factor: The Science of Creating High-Performance Companies.
Trust, Says Who?
But, it turns out, there isn’t exactly consensus on what level of trust exists at a given company. One of the most fascinating findings of Six Seconds’ global workplace survey is that leaders tend to overestimate trust. When asked to score the phrase, “Leaders here are sincere,” which is highly correlated with trust, senior managers’ average answer was 21% higher than the average for front line employees. Uh oh.
Trust Makes the Difference
Is your organization doing enough to cultivate trust?
Remember you can get our latest white paper, The Neuroscience of Trust, and accompanying slides with speaker notes, by clicking on the button below.
Organizational Vitality: The Neuroscience of Trust and Other Key Drivers of Performance
That 21% trust gap between senior leaders and front line workers is only one of many fascinating findings from Six Seconds’ global survey of over 1600 employees worldwide. It offers new insights into people and what drives performance.
Check out the full Vitality Report 2017 here: https://www.6seconds.org/2017/07/23/vital-organization-key-findings/
Latest posts by Michael Miller (see all)
- IQ vs. EQ: Why it matters what we measure - January 14, 2020
- Integrated and Isolated: The Dichotomy of the Digital Era - January 6, 2020
- Addicted to Your Smartphone? Not So Fast. Nir Eyal on How to Make Technology Work for You - January 6, 2020